Do you want to prevent your employee(s) from competing with you?
In Georgia, as an employer, you can prevent an employee(s) from competing with your business so long the agreement(s) are narrowly tailored to protect your legitimate business interest(s). Your legitimate business interest(s) is/are defined as protecting customer relationships, protecting confidential business information, and/or trade secrets. They must be reasonable and reasonableness depends on the employer’s business. For example, you can prevent your employee from disclosing or using identifiable information about source(s) of supplies if that information provides an advantage to its competitors. Thus, it is important to review these agreements in their entirety with an attorney to determine if these clauses, which are known as non-compete agreements would be enforceable in Georgia before signing those agreements.
Secretary of State warns Georgia’s corporate entities to lookout for misleading mailing
Georgia Secretary of State has posted a warning on their website that the office has received complaints about misleading mailing Georgia Corporate Headquarters is using to solicit business from Georgia corporations. According to this warning, the firm offers to complete corporate minutes on behalf of Georgia corporations, which includes Annual Minutes Disclosure Statement for a fee.
The implication from this mailer is that Georgia corporations are required to file corporate minutes with the Secretary of State, which is not the case. In addition, this firm Georgia Corporate Headquarters is not registered in Georgia to do business in this state. Also, the manner in which the solicitations are presented is causing confusion. The important point to remember, however, is that Georgia corporations are not required to file their minutes or do business with Georgia Corporate Headquarters.
If you have any questions, please call the Corporations Division Call Center at 404-656-2817.
Why is it important to form a company?
It is important to form a company because it allows the business owner to insulate personal assets from corporate liability. Corporate liability may stem because a third party commits a crime on your property such as burglary, rape, assault and/or battery. It may stem from a slip and fall on a wet floor. It may stem from tank leak, which contaminates the stream nearby.
There are various ways in which a corporate liability can occur. Although there is no one form that protects from all types of corporate liability, some business forms at least limit the liability. For example, if a business owner forms a corporation, the owner can limit his losses from the above mentioned examples to amount invested in the corporation. In other words, the business owner can protect the personal assets.
Why is it important for a company to have a blogging policy?
Like other personal policies, a blogging policy can help employees understand the issues employees can or cannot discuss on a company blog or a personal blog. A blogging policy can forewarned the employees about the consequences of policy violations. A well thought out blogging policy also provides recourse against the employee blogger who divulges sensitive information on a company or employee's personal blog. In addition, unless a company declares to the world its personnel policies ahead of time, it may not able to separate itself from the employee misconduct, which may result in loss of business reputation. Furthermore, such a policy can guide the company to establish clear standards so the company can take consistent actions in case of a violation rather than cherry pick, which may amount to condoning one employee's misconduct.
But even if company has a blogging policy in place, what should an employer restrict. Should an employer forbid all employee blogs? Should an employer forbid blogs that simply make reference to the company?
Should employer forbid blogs that make only derogatory comments?
There is no one answer that fits all since a company must weigh potential benefits against banning all blogs based on its goals, its products and services, and the applicable laws. For example, a company that bans all blogs may be going overboard since current body of law only permits employers to discipline an employee for comments based on race, gender, interference with business relationship, etcetera. More importantly though, if a company decides to censor its employee blogs, the censorship may impose liability in case of an improper posting that should have been filtered. And if the company does censor the content, what should be the standard for censorship.
As articulated already that even though there are many unanswered questions and the policy that an employer may establish may not protect the company from all types of allegations, nevertheless, it is advisable to have a policy as a company would any other personnel policy since an imperfect policy is better than none at all.
Choosing a business entity requires evaluation of the following basic factors
Once you have decided that you want to form your company, the most critical factor that you must evaluate is whether the business structure offers liability and asset protection that meets your goals. In addition, you must consider the ease of formation and maintenance. Finally, you must evaluate the tax consequences of each structure. Both state and federal laws can influence your choice of entity decision, this article will only discuss state issues in this post but the following post will cover the federal issues that may impact your decision.
State Law
Basic entity types and pros and cons:
1. Sole proprietorship: A kid who sets up lemonade stand to make profit by selling lemonade to his friends and neighbors without taking any formal steps to form a company is a sole proprietor. The pros of this structure are that it is easy to form, it does not require state filings, and there are no documentation requirements such as bylaws or an operating agreement. Thus, the maintenance is simpler than other forms of structures. However, the cons are that this structure does not provide any liability or asset protection. For example, if someone sues, the sole proprietor’s personal assets are at risk. For this very reason this structure should be avoided. Having said that no entity type protects a professional from his or her own professional liability, i.e., an attorney or a physician.
2. Partnership: When two or more persons who associate to carry on as co-owners of a business, they are operating as a partnership. There are several different types of partnerships and the liability and asset protection in each depends on the type of partnership. For example, general partners are jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the partnership, which means if one of the partner files bankruptcy, the other partner is responsible for the bankrupt partner’s share of liability even if the source of those funds is personal assets of the other partner. But limited partners, on the other hand, are only liable to the extent of their share invested in the partnership. In other words, limited partnership shields the personal assets of the partners in a limited partnership. The pros of this structure are that a general partnership is easy to form, it does not require state filings, and there are no documentation requirements. However, the cons are this structure does not offer the best liability and asset protection as articulated above. In addition, if partners do not take the time to decide at the inception of partnership the management, withdrawal, and termination issues, it can complicate dissolution of the partnership.
3. Corporation: A corporation is an entity distinct and separate from its owner. An “S-corporation†is not a separate type of entity rather it is a different method of taxation. In order to form an S-corporation, one must form C-corporation and then select the tax treatment as an S-corporation. A corporation provides an excellent liability and asset protection, which means that a shareholder is not personally liable for the debts/obligations of the corporation, which includes liability stemming from the actions of co-shareholders. In other words, the liability of shareholder is limited to the corporation’s assets not the shareholder’s personal assets. The cons of forming a corporation is that it is one of the most complex entities to form and operate because it requires filing the articles of incorporation with the state’s Secretary of State’s office. It has documentation requirements such as bylaws in addition to annual reports and both directors and shareholder meetings. In other words, it requires high maintenance to preserve this status.
4. Limited Liability Company (LLC): This structure combines the features of a partnership and a corporation, which means that a member of an LLC has liability and asset protection like a shareholder of a corporation without the tax liability that a shareholder suffers. This feature is an excellent reason alone for forming an LLC. In addition, LLC is easier to maintain than a corporation since there is no requirement of maintaining annual meetings, etc. However, the cons of forming an LLC are that it requires state filings, it has documentation requirements such as an operating agreement, and there are annual fees. In addition, an LLC must be managed and controlled according to the operating agreement. If there is no operating agreement in place or the LLC is not managed according to the operating agreement, a plaintiff might be successful in piercing the LLC’s veil, which means the LLC member’s personal assets might be at risk. Finally, it is the newest form of business structure.
Although it may appear that forming an entity is not that complex, it would be a mistake to form an entity without consulting an attorney and an accountant because selecting the right entity that provides you the most liability and asset protection can be complex as well as it could result in you paying more taxes than necessary.